The Invisible Heist: How Artificial Streaming Undermines Genuine Artists

INTRODUCTION In today’s hyper-digitized music industry, the democratization of music distribution
through platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube has opened the door to millions of artists. Anyone
with a laptop and internet connection can now upload a song that could potentially reach millions. However,
behind this apparent opportunity lies a complex and growing threat: artificial streaming. Whi…
SECTION 1: WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL STREAMING? Artificial streaming refers to the use of unethical, automated,
or deceptive methods to increase the play count of songs on digital streaming platforms (DSPs). This
fraudulent practice undermines the core principles of fairness, merit, and transparency in the music
industry.
1.1 BOTS AND SCRIPT FARMS Bots are automated programs specifically designed to simulate the behavior
of a human listener. These bots can stream specific tracks repeatedly, often programmed with randomized
behaviors to avoid detection by anti-fraud algorithms. Script farms—remote networks running these bots
on a large scale—can spoof IP addresses, device types, and location data, mimicking organic listening
activity. The goal is to trick algorithms and royalty systems into crediting fake engagement as real.
1.2 CLICK FARMS Click farms employ large numbers of low-wage workers, often in developing countries, to
manually engage with digital content. In the case of music, these workers are paid to repetitively stream
certain tracks, follow artists, or like playlists. Click farms are harder to detect than bots because they involve
real user accounts and devices. The result is a more convincing form of fraud that skews the perception of
popularity.
1.3 STREAMING PACKAGES Numerous online services—some blatantly advertised on social media—offer
“streaming packages.” For a fee, an artist or label can buy thousands or even millions of streams. These
packages may use bots, click farms, or a combination of both. Although terms of service on platforms like
Spotify ban this behavior, enforcement is inconsistent, and many of these operations continue undetected.
1.4 AI-GENERATED MUSIC Artificial Intelligence tools can now create songs autonomously. Thousands of AI
generated tracks are uploaded daily under fake artist names. These tracks are often paired with artificial
streaming tactics to siphon royalties. Since they cost little to produce and can be mass-generated, they flood
the market, further distorting earnings distribution and user experience.
SECTION 2: THE SCALE AND SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM Artificial streaming is not a niche issue—it is a multi
billion-dollar global problem affecting every level of the industry.
2.1 GLOBAL ESTIMATES According to a 2022 report by the International Federation of the Phonographic
Industry (IFPI), up to 10% of all music streams globally may be fraudulent. With billions of daily streams, this
suggests that tens of millions of plays each day are inauthentic. France’s Centre National de la Musique
reported over 1 billion fake streams in 2021 alone.
2.2 CASE STUDIES – In Denmark, a man used bots to stream his own music and collected over $300,000 in
royalties before being sentenced to prison. – In Brazil, police dismantled a click farm operation involving
1
hundreds of mobile devices used to simulate music plays. – Spotify itself has been accused of creating
“ghost artists”—pseudonymous artists owned by production houses whose music fills out popular playlists,
diverting royalty payments away from legitimate creators.
2.3 IMPACT ON METRICS Fraudulent streaming distorts popularity metrics used by DSPs to recommend new
music. Algorithms designed to promote organic popularity end up boosting tracks that were never truly
popular. This manipulation erodes user trust and creates a feedback loop where only those who cheat the
system benefit.
SECTION 3: IMPACT ON REAL ARTISTS The consequences of artificial streaming are devastating for
legitimate musicians who rely on accurate streaming data to build their careers.
3.1 LOSS OF INCOME Most DSPs use a pro-rata royalty model, where total revenues are divided based on
share of total streams. If fake streams make up 10% of total plays, that’s 10% of the money that goes to
fraudsters instead of real artists. For emerging musicians, this can mean the difference between affording
studio time or quitting altogether.
3.2 BARRIER TO DISCOVERY Playlists are the new radio. When algorithms are manipulated, real artists lose
their chance to be discovered. Artificial streaming floods playlists with tracks that don’t reflect listener
preferences, pushing genuine music into obscurity.
3.3 DAMAGE TO REPUTATION In some cases, artists unknowingly become victims when hired marketing
services use artificial streams. This can lead to the removal of their music, account suspensions, and loss of
credibility in the eyes of fans and industry professionals.
3.4 EROSION OF INDUSTRY TRUST Fans begin to question whether an artist’s success is authentic. Labels
become hesitant to invest in new talent if they cannot trust the data. This undermines the entire ecosystem
of trust that music relies on.
SECTION 4: INDUSTRY RESPONSE The music industry is gradually waking up to the severity of artificial
streaming, though the response has been fragmented.
4.1 STREAMING PLATFORM INITIATIVES Spotify, Apple Music, and others have begun investing in AI
powered fraud detection systems. These tools analyze patterns like skip rates, listening times, and user
behavior to flag suspicious activity. However, false positives remain an issue, and many fraudulent activities
still slip through the cracks.
4.2 INDUSTRY COALITIONS Music Fights Fraud is an international coalition of labels, distributors, and
platforms dedicated to combating stream fraud. Their efforts include shared databases of known
fraudulent actors, coordinated takedowns, and industry-wide transparency standards.
4.3 LEGISLATIVE PRESSURE In the UK, the “Broken Record” campaign has pushed Parliament to review
streaming economics. In the U.S., the FTC has been urged to investigate deceptive practices in digital
distribution. These legislative efforts aim to create regulatory frameworks for digital fairness.
2
4.4 EDUCATION & AWARENESS Industry groups now emphasize artist education. Workshops and online
courses teach musicians how to recognize fraud, avoid disreputable services, and market themselves
ethically.
SECTION 5: SYSTEMIC ISSUES AND STRUCTURAL FLAWS The roots of artificial streaming lie deeper than
individual fraudsters. The structure of the streaming economy itself incentivizes bad behavior.
5.1 THE PRO-RATA MODEL Most platforms use a pro-rata royalty system: listener subscriptions are pooled
and divided based on the share of total streams. This means a user who listens to indie music all month
might still see their money go to top-charted or manipulated songs. A user-centric model, where royalties
go directly to the artists you stream, could eliminate this distortion.
5.2 PLATFORM INCENTIVES Platforms benefit from artificial streaming in subtle ways. If fake streams come
from premium accounts, DSPs still earn revenue. “Ghost artists” inserted into playlists allow platforms to
reduce the royalties they pay, increasing profit margins.
5.3 LACK OF TRANSPARENCY DSPs are often reluctant to disclose detailed royalty breakdowns or detection
methods, citing proprietary algorithms. This opacity prevents artists from fully understanding how they are
paid and protected.
SECTION 6: SOLUTIONS AND ACTION STEPS Solving artificial streaming requires a multi-pronged approach
involving technology, regulation, and community vigilance.
6.1 TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS – Improved bot-detection algorithms using machine learning. – Watermarking
and fingerprinting to track legitimate audio sources. – Smart contracts via blockchain for transparent royalty
distribution.
6.2 REGULATORY REFORM – Mandating public transparency in DSP royalty reporting. – Legislation against
fraudulent stream services. – Creating fair trade standards for digital music akin to other creative sectors.
6.3 ARTIST AND LABEL ACTION – Vet marketing agencies thoroughly. – Monitor analytics for unusual spikes.
Educate fans and partners about the value of authentic listening. – Support and push for user-centric
models.
6.4 CONSUMER RESPONSIBILITY Listeners play a role too. By choosing curated playlists from trusted
sources, avoiding engagement with shady streaming campaigns, and supporting artists directly through
platforms like Bandcamp or Patreon, fans can help shape a healthier ecosystem.
CONCLUSION Artificial streaming is more than just a data problem—it’s a cultural and economic one. It
threatens to redefine success based on manipulation rather than merit. While some may see it as a
victimless crime, the consequences ripple through the entire music industry, robbing genuine talent of
opportunity, revenue, and recognition.
3
To combat this, the industry must adopt a transparent, ethical, and artist-first model. It must empower real
artists, punish manipulation, and educate listeners. Only then can the streaming revolution truly become a
force for musical discovery, not deception.
The time has come for a new standard—where authenticity is rewarded, not cheated